<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highlight Background of Fields With Errors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/</link>
	<description>Politics, Programming and Possibilities</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duane Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 15:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-232</guid>
		<description>J. Weir: Sometimes just the presence of the wrapper div has undesirable results on various browsers.  I prefer to leave it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J. Weir: Sometimes just the presence of the wrapper div has undesirable results on various browsers.  I prefer to leave it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. Weir</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>J. Weir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Why not just use CSS for this?

.fieldWithErrors input {background:#F00; color:#FFF}

And overwrite or replace the other CSS error selectors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just use CSS for this?</p>
<p>.fieldWithErrors input {background:#F00; color:#FFF}</p>
<p>And overwrite or replace the other CSS error selectors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Fugal</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Fugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Erm, "\n* ", not "\\n* ". I was guessing I had to escape the slash, but I guess not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, &#8220;\n* &#8220;, not &#8220;\\n* &#8220;. I was guessing I had to escape the slash, but I guess not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Fugal</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob Fugal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2006/04/13/highlight-background-of-fields-with-errors/#comment-228</guid>
		<description>On the fourth line (third line of the body), you're calculating &lt;code&gt;title&lt;/code&gt;. I don't see this value used anywhere though? Is this a call to a &lt;code&gt;title=&lt;/code&gt; method or unused cruft left over from a refactoring? If the former, what exactly is it doing?

Also, on that line, I assume you're actually joining with "\\n* ", not "n* ", right? Just guessing that something in your blog software ate the slash...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the fourth line (third line of the body), you&#8217;re calculating <code>title</code>. I don&#8217;t see this value used anywhere though? Is this a call to a <code>title=</code> method or unused cruft left over from a refactoring? If the former, what exactly is it doing?</p>
<p>Also, on that line, I assume you&#8217;re actually joining with &#8220;\\n* &#8220;, not &#8220;n* &#8220;, right? Just guessing that something in your blog software ate the slash&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
