In case there was any doubt that electronic voting machines are a “potential risk” to our democracy, listen to the testimony of Clinton Curtis at a U.S. House Judiciary hearing in Ohio.
[...] It’s been known for some time now that these electronic voting machines are exceptionally vulnerable to hackers. That the companies who make these machines would go on record to say that “Electronic voting systems have never been successfully tampered with in an actual election” is naive at best, and seems to imply that if they have never been tampered with then they could never possibly be tampered with in the future. I’m glad that the California Secretary of State is wiser than that. [...]
One Response for "Testimony of Programmer Clinton Curtis"
[...] It’s been known for some time now that these electronic voting machines are exceptionally vulnerable to hackers. That the companies who make these machines would go on record to say that “Electronic voting systems have never been successfully tampered with in an actual election” is naive at best, and seems to imply that if they have never been tampered with then they could never possibly be tampered with in the future. I’m glad that the California Secretary of State is wiser than that. [...]
Leave a reply