Politics, Programming and Possibilities
1 Oct
I’ve seen a lot of people smeared lately for making statements about 9/11 being an inside job, or for believing the United States is in a constitutional crisis–possibly on the brink of disaster. It seems that anyone who holds these views is fodder for the “nutcase” campaign–whether on Fox News, or in online forums and blogs.
The world is a complicated place. There is no doubt that I have some wrong notions. My instinct, for example, has been wrong on several occasions–whether in judging a person’s character, or in ascertaining the veracity of historical documents. Sometimes I wish it were different, but it’s clear that my perspective of the world as a whole is incomplete. I assume that this is the case for everyone else, too.
I respect people’s point of view, however, even though I know we all see incompletes. In fact, for those whose view of current affairs sustains America as the zenith of freedom and liberty in the world, I honestly hope they see something I don’t. I hope the government is not as corrupt as it seems to me. I hope September 11th was not, somehow, allowed or made to happen by our government. I hope that President Bush is a good man who will use his new-found powers of secret imprisonment, secret torture, secret trial and secret execution only to protect America, its people, and its values.
But at the same time, I can’t quiet my conscience on these matters. I can’t permit myself, knowing what I do, to turn a blind eye to politics and history. My father taught me that “absolute power corrupts absolutely.” When I see the executive branch of government gaining power at the expense of the people, I call it corruption. When I read articles whose headlines summarize: “Supreme Court Trims Whistleblower Rights,” “Innocent People Placed on ‘Watch List’ to Meet Quota,” and “Senate Rejects Habeas Corpus in Interrogation Bill,” I feel indignation rise up in my soul. Like Nazi Germany, all that America’s government requires of us is that we do nothing while it changes the foundations upon which we were built.
Degree by degree, from my perspective, this nation is changing. According to Milton Mayer’s “They Thought They Were Free“, that’s exactly what happened to Germans. From my perspective, I have only one choice. Finem respice. Consider the end. Principiis obsta. Resist the beginnings.
5 Responses for "Agree to Disagree, Even with that "Nutcase""
Regarding the Military Commissions Act, anyone calling you a nutcase is blind. I asked an immigration attorney friend of mine about it, and he said, “Yep, according to that, the feds can imprison people forever without ever seeing a courtroom.”
September 29th was the day 12 million people were explicitly stripped of their constitutional rights, and on that there can be no debate.
By the way, in the original blog post I saw re: MCA, you mentioned that in theory you could be held without trial for donating to an international charity that somehow ended up being linked to Al Qaeda. According to the bill, it’s much worse than that.
From Section 7, “Habeas Corpus Matters”:
“`(e)(1) No court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider an application for a writ of habeas corpus filed by or on behalf of an alien detained by the United States who has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.”
The key language is “or is awaiting such determination.” Under this bill, it’s entirely possible for law-abiding permanent legal residents to be arrested for something as nebulous as “suspected of being an enemy of the United States” and then being detained without trial.
Thanks for the comments and info, Pat. The wording is so clear it scares me.
Or is awaiting such determination would only mean that anybody who claims to be a citizen but cannot (will not) present proof should be held until it can be determined whether or not they are a citizen. The feds could determine citizenship of a cooperative suspect in a matter of minutes. The alternative of releasing a dangerous person is more of a concern to me.
You guys don’t seem to concerned with security, while there is a debate raging right now on whether past and former presidents fell short of their constitutional duty to protect the country.
[...] A friend of mine, Jeff Moss, with reference to the Military Commissions Act, recently made the following comment on my post, “Agree to Disagree, Even with that ‘Nutcase’“: “Or is awaiting such determination” would only mean that anybody who claims to be a citizen but cannot (will not) present proof should be held until it can be determined whether or not they are a citizen. The feds could determine citizenship of a cooperative suspect in a matter of minutes. The alternative of releasing a dangerous person is more of a concern to me. [...]
Leave a reply