<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HO.LY went for $1k on ebay</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/</link>
	<description>Politics, Programming and Possibilities</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Moss</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-4304</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-4304</guid>
		<description>I think you find the anti-profit crowd wherever you go. There is a good essay on the subject by Heilbroner in the book "The Worldly Philosphers", unfortunately it's copyrighted and I can't find the full text on the net, but here is a segment:

"The question has come up whether a guild master of the weaving industry should be allowed to try an innovation in his product. The verdict: 'If a cloth weaver intends to process a piece according to his own invention, he must not set it on the loom, but should obtain permission from the judges of the town to employ the number and length of threads that he desires, after the question has been considered by four of the oldest merchants and four of the oldest weavers of the guild.' One can imagine how many suggestions for change were tolerated.

Shortly after the matter of cloth weaving has been disposed of, the button makers guild raises a cry of outrage; the tailors are beginning to make buttons out of cloth, an unheard-of thing. The government, indignant that an innovation should threaten a settled industry, imposes a fine on the cloth-button makers. But the wardens of the button guild are not yet satisfied. They demand the right to search people's homes and wardrobes and fine and even arrest them on the streets if they are seen wearing these subversive goods."

Back in the Medieval period the main culprit was the Roman Catholic Church. Piety was serving your fellow man and anything that could be construed as profiteering was a sin, punishable by death (and it often was punished by death). The French were especially cruel.

These days it seems like more of a liberal mantra. I've met a lot of people who just think entrepreneurs ("businessmen") are rotten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you find the anti-profit crowd wherever you go. There is a good essay on the subject by Heilbroner in the book &#8220;The Worldly Philosphers&#8221;, unfortunately it&#8217;s copyrighted and I can&#8217;t find the full text on the net, but here is a segment:</p>
<p>&#8220;The question has come up whether a guild master of the weaving industry should be allowed to try an innovation in his product. The verdict: &#8216;If a cloth weaver intends to process a piece according to his own invention, he must not set it on the loom, but should obtain permission from the judges of the town to employ the number and length of threads that he desires, after the question has been considered by four of the oldest merchants and four of the oldest weavers of the guild.&#8217; One can imagine how many suggestions for change were tolerated.</p>
<p>Shortly after the matter of cloth weaving has been disposed of, the button makers guild raises a cry of outrage; the tailors are beginning to make buttons out of cloth, an unheard-of thing. The government, indignant that an innovation should threaten a settled industry, imposes a fine on the cloth-button makers. But the wardens of the button guild are not yet satisfied. They demand the right to search people&#8217;s homes and wardrobes and fine and even arrest them on the streets if they are seen wearing these subversive goods.&#8221;</p>
<p>Back in the Medieval period the main culprit was the Roman Catholic Church. Piety was serving your fellow man and anything that could be construed as profiteering was a sin, punishable by death (and it often was punished by death). The French were especially cruel.</p>
<p>These days it seems like more of a liberal mantra. I&#8217;ve met a lot of people who just think entrepreneurs (&#8221;businessmen&#8221;) are rotten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie Viljoen</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3702</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie Viljoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2007 14:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3702</guid>
		<description>Domain camping is really similar to buying up a whole lot of beach-side property for a really good deal and then selling it to developers for big bucks. Or buying house after house as soon as you can afford it, pushing up prices and leaving poorer people to live so far from the capital that they can't afford to pay for transportation to get to their jobs.

There are moral objections to that, but at the same time, the only other investment that beats inflation is a risky stock. So if the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and you have the option to be the rich, should you take it?

I don't know. 

Legally, I think you can domain camp without being sued as long as you don't pick a trade name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domain camping is really similar to buying up a whole lot of beach-side property for a really good deal and then selling it to developers for big bucks. Or buying house after house as soon as you can afford it, pushing up prices and leaving poorer people to live so far from the capital that they can&#8217;t afford to pay for transportation to get to their jobs.</p>
<p>There are moral objections to that, but at the same time, the only other investment that beats inflation is a risky stock. So if the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, and you have the option to be the rich, should you take it?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know. </p>
<p>Legally, I think you can domain camp without being sued as long as you don&#8217;t pick a trade name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3633</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:54:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3633</guid>
		<description>Wow, Max... I was looking for that :)  I also found dict.org which does a good job ("match suffixes").</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, Max&#8230; I was looking for that <img src='http://blog.inquirylabs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I also found dict.org which does a good job (&#8221;match suffixes&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3632</link>
		<dc:creator>Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 16:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3632</guid>
		<description>This is a very good idea!

Check out all these words ending in .ly!

http://wordnavigator.com/ends-with/ly/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very good idea!</p>
<p>Check out all these words ending in .ly!</p>
<p><a href="http://wordnavigator.com/ends-with/ly/" rel="nofollow">http://wordnavigator.com/ends-with/ly/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Aylott</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3616</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Aylott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Feb 2007 08:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/02/17/holy-went-for-1k-on-ebay/#comment-3616</guid>
		<description>Bah. People are silly.
If you didn't buy HO.LY some SPAMtastic organization would've gotten it.

You provided a service for all the internet by reserving these domains for legitimate use.

And in the meantime you can make tons of money on google ads for viagra! :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bah. People are silly.<br />
If you didn&#8217;t buy HO.LY some SPAMtastic organization would&#8217;ve gotten it.</p>
<p>You provided a service for all the internet by reserving these domains for legitimate use.</p>
<p>And in the meantime you can make tons of money on google ads for viagra! <img src='http://blog.inquirylabs.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
