There was a great debate between the Democratic presidential candidates a few days ago (Apr. 26th). Overall, I was quite impressed. There is intelligent conversation going on in democratic circles. Even though I’m more of a Libertarian, I have to hope that several of these candidates get more attention.

One of the first things I noticed was that everyone had a very clear anti-war platform. No one was for the war. That’s a good first step, I think. It seems that our current president has at least one merit—he’s definitely taught the next commander in chief what not to do.

As I took notes on the debate, I was keen to see who grabbed the crowd’s attention best. Biden was able to make everyone laugh when he countered the accusation, “some say you are too verbose. Have you changed?” with a simple “Yes.”

Former Senator Mike Gravel was a surprise candidate that drew a crowd. I resonated with his very direct and very powerful opposition (even anger!) at the war. He was definitely the most energetic of the bunch. He also drew laughter when the host asked why he had earlier made the statement that he was surprised he’d made it so far. To this, he replied:

You’re right–I made that statement. But that’s before I had a chance to stand with them a couple three times. It’s like going in to the Senate. the first time you get there, you’re all excited–my God, how did I ever get here? Then about six months later, you say, how the hell did the rest of them get here?

Gravel says he would make a 180 degree turn for America with regard to the war as his first item of business. Here is a video comprised only of Gravel’s (short) contributions to the debate at South Carolina State, as well as an interview with him afterward.

I like how Kucinich referred to himself as a “healer.” He’s right to point out that we need one. Maybe he’s the guy to do it—I don’t know. I certainly approve of his initiative to impeach Cheney, and I am entirely impressed that he voted against the war in the first place!

Chris Dodd seemed to be the Senator I agreed with least. He accepts lobbyist funds, is against assault weapons and seems to endorse more gun control.

Senator Clinton seemed kind of in the background to me. I didn’t really hear anything I was really for or against. Maybe she intended to be a neutral player?

Senator Edwards was more of the same to me.

I liked Governor Richards’ candor, but I didn’t feel a lot of strength coming from him.

I really liked Barack Obama’s comment that we need to “move away from divisive issues” and focus on areas where we agree. He cited prevention of teen pregnancy as an area where we can all put positive energy in to, rather than draining ourselves in the fight on government regulation of abortion.

Intelligent conversation and good moderation. I’m glad this wasn’t on Fox News channel.

Update: Apparently, CNN is barring Gravel from joining in the debate there, so here is a petition we can sign to encourage a fair and inclusive debate, specifically to encourage CNN to rethink this decision.