<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good News for Democracy&#8212;California Decertifies Electronic Voting Machines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/08/05/good-news-for-democracy-california-decertifies-electronic-voting-machines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/08/05/good-news-for-democracy-california-decertifies-electronic-voting-machines/</link>
	<description>Politics, Programming and Possibilities</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Duane Johnson</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/08/05/good-news-for-democracy-california-decertifies-electronic-voting-machines/#comment-14107</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 02:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/08/05/good-news-for-democracy-california-decertifies-electronic-voting-machines/#comment-14107</guid>
		<description>Eric: Yes, if I understand correctly the full answer is that the machines were "decertified" and then "recertified with conditions" meaning that the manufacturers must comply with their recommendations before they can be used for the upcoming elections (such as the February presidential primaries).  The conditions seem fairly reasonable to me, although I haven't taken a thorough look at all of the PDF documents yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric: Yes, if I understand correctly the full answer is that the machines were &#8220;decertified&#8221; and then &#8220;recertified with conditions&#8221; meaning that the manufacturers must comply with their recommendations before they can be used for the upcoming elections (such as the February presidential primaries).  The conditions seem fairly reasonable to me, although I haven&#8217;t taken a thorough look at all of the PDF documents yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Robeck</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/08/05/good-news-for-democracy-california-decertifies-electronic-voting-machines/#comment-14101</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Robeck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 22:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/08/05/good-news-for-democracy-california-decertifies-electronic-voting-machines/#comment-14101</guid>
		<description>I have not been following this story closely, but it seems things may not be over yet. Engadget just put out an illuminating &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/05/california-official-gives-ok-to-voting-systems-that-failed-secur/" rel="nofollow"&gt;post&lt;/a&gt;, which indicates that the voting machines would still be approved pending firmware changes and other restrictions.

Let's hope somebody with greater sense can turn the process around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have not been following this story closely, but it seems things may not be over yet. Engadget just put out an illuminating <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2007/08/05/california-official-gives-ok-to-voting-systems-that-failed-secur/" rel="nofollow">post</a>, which indicates that the voting machines would still be approved pending firmware changes and other restrictions.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hope somebody with greater sense can turn the process around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
