<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Kucinich Set Up to be Discredited?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/</link>
	<description>Politics, Programming and Possibilities</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 04:38:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Travis Coats</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-21162</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis Coats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 03:16:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-21162</guid>
		<description>*Strictly on the UFO question-
Since when did admitting to a UFO sighting discredit a human as being morally or ethically unstable? I have seen more evidence to point to the opposite stance. Those who reject do so on blind intuition and a social dynamic pressure, not lack of evidence...most don't care to even look into something they think of a preposterous. There is plenty of reading, over a millennia worth, to become lost in. To say something so blatantly ignorant and "modern," as "should this guy be even thought of for the election..." is ridiculous in itself. How the hell do they pick these guys?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Strictly on the UFO question-<br />
Since when did admitting to a UFO sighting discredit a human as being morally or ethically unstable? I have seen more evidence to point to the opposite stance. Those who reject do so on blind intuition and a social dynamic pressure, not lack of evidence&#8230;most don&#8217;t care to even look into something they think of a preposterous. There is plenty of reading, over a millennia worth, to become lost in. To say something so blatantly ignorant and &#8220;modern,&#8221; as &#8220;should this guy be even thought of for the election&#8230;&#8221; is ridiculous in itself. How the hell do they pick these guys?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gravel kucinich paul nader</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-18844</link>
		<dc:creator>gravel kucinich paul nader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 02:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-18844</guid>
		<description>Colbert gravel kucinich paul nader perot carter [conyers?rangel?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.

The people know too much,
democracy rising democracy now.
Rage against the machine.

Honesty compassion intelligence guts.

No more extortion blackmail bribery division.
Divided we fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Colbert gravel kucinich paul nader perot carter [conyers?rangel?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.</p>
<p>The people know too much,<br />
democracy rising democracy now.<br />
Rage against the machine.</p>
<p>Honesty compassion intelligence guts.</p>
<p>No more extortion blackmail bribery division.<br />
Divided we fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maz2331</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17927</link>
		<dc:creator>Maz2331</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17927</guid>
		<description>"Tim" said:

"Ron Paul has gotten even more support and beginning to threaten the Republicans with the 'risk he might win'. You think this was bad with Kucinich, just you wait to see what they bust out against Ron Paul."

Let them bring it.  It won't work.  Paul is able to withstand such attacks.

As for Dennis... well, the guy is is far too socialist to get my support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tim&#8221; said:</p>
<p>&#8220;Ron Paul has gotten even more support and beginning to threaten the Republicans with the &#8216;risk he might win&#8217;. You think this was bad with Kucinich, just you wait to see what they bust out against Ron Paul.&#8221;</p>
<p>Let them bring it.  It won&#8217;t work.  Paul is able to withstand such attacks.</p>
<p>As for Dennis&#8230; well, the guy is is far too socialist to get my support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giles Bowkett</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17926</link>
		<dc:creator>Giles Bowkett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17926</guid>
		<description>Absolutely he was. Read the article on political consultants ("Making Mitt Romney") in the current issue of Harper's Magazine. A key figure in the Republican campaigns built their career by pulling an extremely similar and absolutely deliberate stunt in South Carolina.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely he was. Read the article on political consultants (&#8221;Making Mitt Romney&#8221;) in the current issue of Harper&#8217;s Magazine. A key figure in the Republican campaigns built their career by pulling an extremely similar and absolutely deliberate stunt in South Carolina.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17925</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17925</guid>
		<description>"We Report. You Decide." - In other words "we way whatever we want, it's up to you to figure out what's true and what's a blatant lie or a spin on the facts".

Might as well not give them the publicity by linking their site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;We Report. You Decide.&#8221; - In other words &#8220;we way whatever we want, it&#8217;s up to you to figure out what&#8217;s true and what&#8217;s a blatant lie or a spin on the facts&#8221;.</p>
<p>Might as well not give them the publicity by linking their site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17924</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17924</guid>
		<description>Indeed it was a setup.
Kucinich's response was completely sane.  He saw something, he didn't know what it was.

Anybody that is now questioning Kucinich's sanity as a result of THIS question was drawn in by the media bias.

I figured it was because Kucinich was the only real anti-war guy up there, didn't know about the Bush comment.

Ron Paul has gotten even more support and beginning to threaten the Republicans with the "risk he might win".  You think this was bad with Kucinich, just you wait to see what they bust out against Ron Paul.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it was a setup.<br />
Kucinich&#8217;s response was completely sane.  He saw something, he didn&#8217;t know what it was.</p>
<p>Anybody that is now questioning Kucinich&#8217;s sanity as a result of THIS question was drawn in by the media bias.</p>
<p>I figured it was because Kucinich was the only real anti-war guy up there, didn&#8217;t know about the Bush comment.</p>
<p>Ron Paul has gotten even more support and beginning to threaten the Republicans with the &#8220;risk he might win&#8221;.  You think this was bad with Kucinich, just you wait to see what they bust out against Ron Paul.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Was Kucinich Set Up to be Discredited? &#124; Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17923</link>
		<dc:creator>Was Kucinich Set Up to be Discredited? &#124; Political news - democrats republicans socialists greens liberals conservatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2007/10/31/was-kucinich-set-up-to-be-discredited/#comment-17923</guid>
		<description>[...] the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback.       &#8249; 50% of Americans are Democrats, 38% considered Republicans Bhutto Won’t AcceptMusharraf ‘State of Emergency’ Stunt &#8250; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback.       &lsaquo; 50% of Americans are Democrats, 38% considered Republicans Bhutto Won’t AcceptMusharraf ‘State of Emergency’ Stunt &rsaquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
