Politics, Programming and Possibilities
31 Oct
It was a weird coincidence… but then, I’m a little more informed about politics now, so I wouldn’t be surprised to find out it was intentional.
Democratic presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich recently spoke publicly about his skepticism over President George W. Bush’s sanity—literally. Said Congressman Kucinich:
I seriously believe we have to start asking questions about his mental health… There’s something wrong. He does not seem to understand his words have real impact.
Then, at the debate yesterday, Chris Matthews went to town after asking Kucinich to confirm that he (Kucinich) had once seen a UFO. It was as if “Hardball” Matthews couldn’t get enough laughs out of popping the UFO question on other candidates too—do you believe in UFOs? Is there a government conspiracy (haha)?
First of all, it was one of those questions that really doesn’t help in a debate—sure, it might be interesting to know what a candidate thinks, but it was about as useful as Adam Curry asking if Ron Paul is a “folder” or a “scruncher”… irrelevant and irreverant.
Second, it was clear from the context that Dennis was just being honest—he saw something in the sky, and couldn’t identify it, hence it is an Unidentified Flying Object (UFO). He marveled at the sight of it, and felt some kind of awe. This is a reaction I would expect from any open-minded individual at the sight of something mysterious.
But the spin on the incident was out of this world—almost as if it was an intentional jab meant to cripple Kucinich’s earlier claim that President Bush may literally be insane. Who wants to believe our president is crazy on the word of some crazy guy, right?
If it’s any consolation, Dennis, you’re not alone.
UPDATE: Our favorite government news source, Fox News reports Dennis Kucinich’s UFO Comments Prove He’s Nuts.
7 Responses for "Was Kucinich Set Up to be Discredited?"
[...] the permalink. Follow comments here with the RSS feed. Comments are closed, but you can leave a trackback. ‹ 50% of Americans are Democrats, 38% considered Republicans Bhutto Won’t AcceptMusharraf ‘State of Emergency’ Stunt › [...]
Indeed it was a setup.
Kucinich’s response was completely sane. He saw something, he didn’t know what it was.
Anybody that is now questioning Kucinich’s sanity as a result of THIS question was drawn in by the media bias.
I figured it was because Kucinich was the only real anti-war guy up there, didn’t know about the Bush comment.
Ron Paul has gotten even more support and beginning to threaten the Republicans with the “risk he might win”. You think this was bad with Kucinich, just you wait to see what they bust out against Ron Paul.
“We Report. You Decide.” - In other words “we way whatever we want, it’s up to you to figure out what’s true and what’s a blatant lie or a spin on the facts”.
Might as well not give them the publicity by linking their site.
Absolutely he was. Read the article on political consultants (”Making Mitt Romney”) in the current issue of Harper’s Magazine. A key figure in the Republican campaigns built their career by pulling an extremely similar and absolutely deliberate stunt in South Carolina.
“Tim” said:
“Ron Paul has gotten even more support and beginning to threaten the Republicans with the ‘risk he might win’. You think this was bad with Kucinich, just you wait to see what they bust out against Ron Paul.”
Let them bring it. It won’t work. Paul is able to withstand such attacks.
As for Dennis… well, the guy is is far too socialist to get my support.
Colbert gravel kucinich paul nader perot carter [conyers?rangel?] united for truth elicit fear smear blacklist.
The people know too much,
democracy rising democracy now.
Rage against the machine.
Honesty compassion intelligence guts.
No more extortion blackmail bribery division.
Divided we fall.
*Strictly on the UFO question-
Since when did admitting to a UFO sighting discredit a human as being morally or ethically unstable? I have seen more evidence to point to the opposite stance. Those who reject do so on blind intuition and a social dynamic pressure, not lack of evidence…most don’t care to even look into something they think of a preposterous. There is plenty of reading, over a millennia worth, to become lost in. To say something so blatantly ignorant and “modern,” as “should this guy be even thought of for the election…” is ridiculous in itself. How the hell do they pick these guys?
Leave a reply