<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Functional Programming Languages</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2008/01/20/functional-programming-languages/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2008/01/20/functional-programming-languages/</link>
	<description>Politics, Programming and Possibilities</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cynbe</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2008/01/20/functional-programming-languages/#comment-27483</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 20:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2008/01/20/functional-programming-languages/#comment-27483</guid>
		<description>You might want to check out Mythryl:
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythryl
  http://mythryl.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to check out Mythryl:<br />
  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythryl" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mythryl</a><br />
  <a href="http://mythryl.org/" rel="nofollow">http://mythryl.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: So Erlang It Is</title>
		<link>http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2008/01/20/functional-programming-languages/#comment-23594</link>
		<dc:creator>So Erlang It Is</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 10:31:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.inquirylabs.com/2008/01/20/functional-programming-languages/#comment-23594</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Functional&#8221;-ity: It turns out that I missed Erlang in my functional-language round-up a few days ago. Erlang is a functional language, and therefore benefits from a concise and expressive syntax. In addition, it doesn&#8217;t seem to suffer from some of the same difficulties that purely functional languages do when dealing with I/O. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Functional&#8221;-ity: It turns out that I missed Erlang in my functional-language round-up a few days ago. Erlang is a functional language, and therefore benefits from a concise and expressive syntax. In addition, it doesn&#8217;t seem to suffer from some of the same difficulties that purely functional languages do when dealing with I/O. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
