InquiryLabs

Politics, Programming and Possibilities

Archive for October, 2008

New Kind of Massively Parallel Online Gaming

Neat idea: trade permission to use your computer for free gaming.  While you play, your CPU is used to compute tasks orchestrated by Plura Processing.  In turn, the game developer is paid for making the connection between the game player and the person or company that wants to hire out computational tasks.

I think I like the idea because I love gaming and don’t like to pay for it.  I wonder how many others there are out there who feel the same way… :)

Posted by email from Duane’s Quick Posts (posterous)

  • 1 Comment
  • Filed under: Uncategorized
  • Singularity Summit: Bob Pisani Q&A

    Q&A:
    1. Talk about keep the humans in the driver seat : particular kind of intelligence that generates war, torture, etc. Possible to engineer an intelligence without baggage? Even if it is not superintelligent, maybe turn world over to it.  We can’t give up our faults because of what we are.
        - We carry around “bloody baggage”. Going forward, intelligence will be nicer in positive sum game.  Playing positive sum games because much more plausible (with higher intelligence).
        - Phenotypic evolutionary changes may have stopped with civilization, but culturally we’ve improved in last 5 centuries.  Reason to be optimistic.
    2. Do you believe climate change will have a significant impact on the singularity?
        - Possible existential threat if it leads to nuclear war.  Not one of the most serious existential threats that we would face, however, so “probably no”.

    Posted by email from Duane’s Quick Posts (posterous)

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Uncategorized
  • Posted by email from Duane’s Quick Posts (posterous)

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Uncategorized
  • I was thinking about conspiracies the other day and kinda stumbled into the realization that the idea of a devil is probably the most widely adopted conspiracy theory in the history of the world.  Of course, not everyone is Christian, but the idea of personified evil was, as far as I understand it, first taught by the ancient Persian, Zoroaster (the father of Zoroastrianism) and later adopted by Christianity.

    Isn’t it an interesting conspiracy?  The idea as I’ve been taught it goes something like this: there is a real, but almost always invisible male being out there somewhere who is not omnipotent, but nevertheless powerful.  He is selfishly interested in the destruction and misery of all people everywhere, and he devotes (as nearly as I can tell) every waking moment to the cunning art of deception.  What’s more, he is actually interested in me individually and I can never be sure if he’s watching, possibly learning about me and my weaknesses.  Having learned about my individual weaknesses, he will use his surreptitiously gained information against me.
    I guess I just hadn’t thought of this as a conspiracy theory before, probably because I learned about the devil in my youth before I even knew what a conspiracy was.  Sometimes I wonder if the theory does more harm than good.  I’ve found that people take the theory in varying degrees of seriousness, and those who take it extremely seriously sometimes make me nervous.  The problem with most conspiracies is that there is never sufficient evidence to actually pin the blame on the correct party.  Thus, whether something that happens to a person is actually caused by a devil is never something that person can be sure of, and so the theory itself can occasionally be the cause of paranoia (whether or not the theory is correct).
    Ok, Duane.  Back to homework now.

    Update: I apologize if I offended anyone. This was an exercise in looking in at my own culture “from the outside” and I didn’t mean to be confrontational.

    Singularity Summit Next Weekend

    Kelty and I are going to the Singularity Summit in San Jose next weekend.  I’m so excited to go!  I feel like I will be among giants, just kind of observing and learning from their ways of thinking.  Who knows, maybe we’ll start a new DNA club, or talk about the next steps to combining biological and robotic components.  Or maybe we’ll stick to the basics and try to estimate when artificial intelligence will be strong enough to convince most human beings that it is sentient.  Fun times!

    Posted by email from Duane’s Quick Posts (posterous)

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Uncategorized
  • Patrick Byrne Vindicated?

    Overstock CEO Patrick Byrne has led a campaign to reveal some dangers in the practice of “naked short” selling. In his view, it was a part of the cause of the failure of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, AIG, and Lehman Brothers. Now, a very interesting article has been published at The Register that ties pieces of the story together: it seems that one Mr. Gary Weiss—who has deep connections with the Depository Trust and Clearing Corporation (the institution that would be in a position to know how bad the naked shorting situation is)—has been actively keeping Byrne’s view of naked shorts out of the picture on Wikipedia. Sounds rotten to me. Here’s the full Register article.

    Related: My article a little over a year ago on Fractional Reserve Brokeraging

  • 0 Comments
  • Filed under: Economy